Sam shamoun said:

Sam used john 1:14 in his concept to utterly blaspheme to fallacious heights. He misconstrued basing on simple translation without the analogy of given definition! 


The Greek used: “ginomai” which means “to become, literally or figuratively!”

Now, we’re left with a dillema, did the word literally become human or figuratively?

Considering context, inevitably, the conclusion would be, the word became human in figurative terms, that is, conditionally a state of the word indwelling in a prepared human body, as stated:

Hebrews 10:5

[5]Wherefore when he (word) cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body (human) hast thou prepared me (word)!

As you can see, there was no transmutation, from being a spirit (word) then having transmutated to mere human flesh, bec the verse stated clearly, that the word is by itself a different entity than the human body prepared for the word that came to earth.

It likewise is manifested it this terms, jesus said “i came down from heaven!”. The human body did not come from heaven, thus nullifying any thought of transmutation, much so as implicated in these verses below:

Matthew 12:40

[40]For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. 

1 Peter 3:18-20

[18]For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

[19]By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;

[20]Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

Ecclesiastes 3:21

[21]Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth?

By logical analogy, jesus human body was in the grave while the “word”, the god, the spirit, went to the spirits in prison, which realm was not on earth as spirits of the dead dont remain on earth but to inevitably, go upward whereas jesus human body was in the grave, therefore clearly, differentiating between human body in the grave and the “word” in the prison of spirits upward from the earth nullifying any thought of transmutation or incarnation! as human body in the grave is a separate entity from the “word”, the spirit, the god outside the earth! so as clearly, established, so when, it say,

Ephesians 4:9-10

[9](Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the world?

[10]He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)

Obviously, the lower parts of the world is not earthly, bec spirits of the dead go upward not downward in earth, and saying, the one that descended there is the one that ascended up, speaks not of his human body, bec no flesh can enter heaven,

1 Corinthians 15:49-50

[49]And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

[50]Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

Therefore, what it spoke of as the one who ascended is the same who descended which entity cannot have flesh as no flesh can enter heaven, speaks of other than his human body,  but obviously, the “word”, the spirit, the god, the one immutable, “jesus Christ the same yesterday today and forever”,  clarifying against any truth of word-become-flesh sort of incarnation or transmutation!

Hebrews 13:7-8

[7]Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God…

[8]Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.




Occasionally, some of your visitors may see an advertisement here
You can hide these ads completely by upgrading to one of our paid plans.


Share this:

Published by butzdenn

I am an inactive mcgi, schizophrenic and blogger. My blogs have fundamental basis from mcgi doctrine which i expounded through personal study and self-interpretation, so obviously, you could expect my blog arguments to be partly, or could be, if i am correctly guided, equally mcgi.

Post navigation


Leave a Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s